<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proxy Scripts Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/</link>
	<description>Build, Learn &#38; Earn with Proxies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daan</title>
		<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-5270</link>
		<dc:creator>Daan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/#comment-5270</guid>
		<description>hey
look for this peace :)
 

if ($_flags[&#039;include_form&#039;] &amp;&amp; !isset($_GET[&#039;nf&#039;]))
    {$_url_form&lt;/code&gt;    &lt;snip&gt;

        foreach ($_flags as $flag_name =&gt; $flag_value)
        {
            if (!$_frozen_flags[$flag_name])
            {
$&#039; /&gt; &#039; . $_labels[$flag_name][0] . &#039; &#039;;
            }
        }

the $_labels are the labels for the checkboxes defined earlier....
the form is the whole thing with checkboxes included :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey<br />
look for this peace <img src='http://www.webproxyblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>if ($_flags['include_form'] &amp;&amp; !isset($_GET['nf']))<br />
    {$_url_form    <snip></p>
<p>        foreach ($_flags as $flag_name =&gt; $flag_value)<br />
        {<br />
            if (!$_frozen_flags[$flag_name])<br />
            {<br />
$' /&gt; ' . $_labels[$flag_name][0] . ' ';<br />
            }<br />
        }</p>
<p>the $_labels are the labels for the checkboxes defined earlier....<br />
the form is the whole thing with checkboxes included <img src='http://www.webproxyblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </snip></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unblock Myspace</title>
		<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>Unblock Myspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post, very informative.  I am new to proxies and I have been confused on which to use.   Thanks to your post, I will stay with the PHP and build a network with those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post, very informative.  I am new to proxies and I have been confused on which to use.   Thanks to your post, I will stay with the PHP and build a network with those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Sajjad&lt;/b&gt; Glad you liked the post and thanks for the comments. CGI Proxy is better for logging into sites but the best proxies out there all seem to run on either phproxy or a custom script. I havnt seen CPU issues but im eating through XXX GB per month at the mo

&lt;b&gt;Fat Aussie&lt;/b&gt; - Theres lots of people needing proxies at school and certain proxies get blocked by countries all the time so people need new ones, hence why so many people make them because there is enough demand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Sajjad</b> Glad you liked the post and thanks for the comments. CGI Proxy is better for logging into sites but the best proxies out there all seem to run on either phproxy or a custom script. I havnt seen CPU issues but im eating through XXX GB per month at the mo</p>
<p><b>Fat Aussie</b> &#8211; Theres lots of people needing proxies at school and certain proxies get blocked by countries all the time so people need new ones, hence why so many people make them because there is enough demand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Aussie</title>
		<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Aussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I dont understand the big deal with Proxy sites

They are popping up everywhere.

Why are they so popular?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand the big deal with Proxy sites</p>
<p>They are popping up everywhere.</p>
<p>Why are they so popular?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajjad</title>
		<link>http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Sajjad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webproxyblog.com/proxy-scripts-part-1/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the excellent post. Though I haven&#039;t been running a proxy for long, I have noticed a couple of things about PHProxy.

It definitely is simple to use. However, it&#039;s not just bandwidth that gets eaten up. I think the main thing that running the script affects is CPU utilization. It just goes through the roof even with relatively light traffic.

CGIproxy may perform better in such a case, but I&#039;d hate to have to play with Perl code again. There was also one written in Python, but it was worse than both of these in terms of being customizeable and easy to setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the excellent post. Though I haven&#8217;t been running a proxy for long, I have noticed a couple of things about PHProxy.</p>
<p>It definitely is simple to use. However, it&#8217;s not just bandwidth that gets eaten up. I think the main thing that running the script affects is CPU utilization. It just goes through the roof even with relatively light traffic.</p>
<p>CGIproxy may perform better in such a case, but I&#8217;d hate to have to play with Perl code again. There was also one written in Python, but it was worse than both of these in terms of being customizeable and easy to setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

